News

FVRD reworking to trim costs

Taxpayers from Abbotsford to Boston Bar will save $450,000 this year thanks to “corporate re-structuring” at the Fraser Valley Regional District (FVRD).

But some directors in the electoral areas outside municipalities fear rural residents may lose part of their democratic representation as some committees are cut to “streamline” operations.

Dennis Adamson, Yale electoral area director, said the changes were made “under the illusion that we’re going to save money ... what we’ve done [instead] is eliminated a lot of discussion on lots of issues.
“I fear my people are not going to get represented to their full extent,” he said, at last week’s board meeting.
The $450,000 in savings stem, in part, from a “limited” hiring freeze that started in 2010, and which saw a number of staff positions eliminated by attrition rather than lay-offs.

But a number of committees were also cut as the FVRD “recast” its operations into two divisions, regional and corporate services (RCSC) and community and regulatory services (CRSC).
The former electoral area services committee, where rural issues were discussed by all the electoral area directors before going to the full board, has been rolled into the CRSC, which will now deal with all “community” issues.

The RCSC replaces the former executive committee, and the committees for parks and the environment as well.
But only three electoral area directors and six mayors will sit on the committee.
Director Wendy Bales, whose electoral area includes Lake Errock and Hemlock Valley, said after the board meeting that rural areas have only one representative, unlike municipalities that have several directors at the FVRD board.

“I wouldn’t expect that the mayors of cities of the FVRD would have the time to be informed about all the issues in my electoral area,” she said, and be able to give those issues full voice on the new RCSC.

She agreed electoral area directors can speak at the RCSC — but they still won’t have a vote there.
“I still plan to attend the new committee, but [I] feel that it is at more of a disadvantage to the ratepayers that I represent,” she said.

Director David Lamson voted with Bales and Adamson, but he felt any issues of concern to electoral areas could still be dealt with at the CRSC, and there will be electoral area directors sitting on the new RCSC.

“I think [the re-structuring] is a good thing, and I support it,” he said.
If all seven electoral area directors sat on the RCSC, they could conceivably out-vote the six mayors, who represent 95 per cent of the FVRD population.

The reworking also means a $523,939 increase in the total taxes collected from the seven electoral areas, rising to $4.1 million in 2011 from $3.6 million in 2010.

Mission residents will see the FVRD portion of their municipal taxes drop by $166,547 (20.4 per cent) to $651,522 in 2011 from $818,069 in 2010.
The FVRD tax requisition for the “average assessed house” in Chilliwack will be $35.21 in 2011 compared to $43.99 in 2010.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Teacher strike cheques in the mail
 
COUNCIL ROUNDUP: More youth encouraged to voice opinions on downtown
 
Candidates talk about social services
Dog with four-pound tumour gets life-changing surgery in Chilliwack
 
Campaign trail tarred with ‘gay serum’ rumour
 
In the ditch
Military theme of Langley Rotary Club gala is very timely
 
Native art stolen in break-in
 
Election 2014: Surrey councillor candidates take on questions

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 31 edition online now. Browse the archives.